===> The following configuration options are available for openzfs-2.4.4,1:
DEBUG=off: Build with debugging support
PYTHON=off: Build the pyzfs library, zarcsummary, zarcstat, and dbufstat utilities
TESTS=off: Install the ZFS Test Suite
===> Use 'make config' to modify these settings
Ensure that any zfs-related commands, such as zpool, zfs, as used in scripts
and in your terminal sessions, use the correct path of ${PREFIX}/sbin/ and
not the /sbin/ commands provided by the FreeBSD base system.
Consider setting this in your shell profile defaults!
filesystems/openzfs: unbreak compilation on head
Unbreak build on FreeBSD 16 by adding nvpair.c patch from upstream
Source: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/18154
python.mk: rename PYTHON_EXT_SUFFIX to PYTHON_TAG, document, etc
EXT_SUFFIX, according to PEP 3149, refers to the full tag and
extension for compiled extension module objects, eg .cpython-311.so,
.cpython-313t.so, etc. We do not use the correct semantic meaning,
and this usage becomes ambiguous and confusing when tags do not
match between bytecode and compiled extension module objects.
Rename our PYTHON_EXT_SUFFIX to PYTHON_TAG to align with PEP 3147's
specification of a magic tag, which consists of implementation name
and shorthand version only. This is meant for bytecode and other
files containing this tag in their filename that do not depend on
a specific Python ABI for the same version. Chase all existing
consumers.
(Only the first 15 lines of the commit message are shown above )
filesystems: add new category for file systems and related utilities
The filesystems category houses file systems and file system utilities.
It is added mainly to turn the sysutils/fusefs-* pseudo-category into
a proper one, but is also useful for the sundry of other file systems
related ports found in the tree.
Ports that seem like they belong there are moved to the new category.
Two ports, sysutils/fusefs-funionfs and sysutils/fusefs-fusepak are
not moved as they currently don't fetch and don't have TIMESTAMP set
in their distinfo, but that is required to be able to push a rename
of the port by the pre-receive hook.
Approved by: portmgr (rene)
Reviewed by: mat
Pull Request: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/pull/302
PR: 281988
